HomeLatest IssueArchivesAboutMeet The Team PrivacyAuthorsContact
Newspaper of the students of the University of Surrey 

Check out some articles in these categories...


More Science stories...

Experiments Gone Wrong

If there’s anything worse than nurture intervening with nature, then it’ll surprise me. Nature is innate in all species and although this is an on-going debate, it is one not to be presumed until explored or experienced.Read more...

Why my brother resembles an ape - and why I’m proud…ish

    A round shaped head, patches of fur, and the all-familiar forward-leaning jaw; all tell-tale features of a creature so closely related; my brother. But this isn’t a piece filled with petty squabbles and the unresolved soap-opera of our youth; this is a tribute to our long-lost family – to creatures that walk like you and talk like you, too.Read more...

Mini guide to science writing

  Now, our section isn’t all about the latest in science and technology news – it’s also about us authors and our writing. Each article is unique to its author’s style and perspective (as long as it’s not a product of churnalism…).Read more...

You are here: Science & Tech » Science » Whoever said DNA was an exclusive?



Whoever said DNA was an exclusive?

Published 1st May 2012

If you thought that DNA or its sister molecule, RNA, were the only means of storing genetic information-think again!   A team of researchers at Cambridge University have successfully created synthetic alternatives called xeno-nucleic acids (XNAs) which can not only store genetic information- but are almost as capable of evolving.

Picture it: a spiralling ladder-with each step a sugar bound to a molecule in the middle called a base (one to each sugar) and you have envisaged the very basic structure of DNA.   The base can be one of four different molecules, represented by the letters A, C, T and G.  RNA is similar but bears some important differences, being single as opposed to double stranded and having U instead of T as a base.  However, it was not so much the bases that the researchers were interested in -but the sugar element.  By replacing the sugar with other alternatives, they managed to produce six different XNAs.

To test whether or not XNAs were capable of evolving, the team presented various XNAs with a ‘survival challenge:’ they were to bind to one of two target molecules (a protein and a molecule RNA) –or be washed away. Those that stuck were replicated and given the same treatment again.  With each test, variations in the genetic code led to XNAs that were increasingly adept at binding the targets.  They displayed a capacity for change, such as we might see with DNA or RNA.

There is much to be done before it is possible to create the first XNA-based synthetic life form.  So far, the team have managed to replicate XNA by converting it back to DNA for use as a template, but have not yet found a way of doing so without using DNA as an intermediate.  Nonetheless, the implications are vast.

The sugars seen in RNA or DNA are both relatively complex, so it is quite possible that simpler alternatives like certain XNAs came first in the evolution of life on Earth, some scientists believe.  Crucially though, as Dr. Phillip Holliger of the UK Medical Research Council’s Molecular Biology Laboratory explains; the research shows that “heredity-information storage and propagation- and evolution…two hallmarks of life…can be reproduced and implemented in alternative polymers other than DNA and RNA.” If there is life beyond Earth, who knows what it might use instead!

Your thoughts...



The Stag is part of The University of Surrey Students' Union Website designed and hosted by AndyMSmith.co.uk